Disclaimer: The highlights and links are being auto inserted by Google without my consent. My apologies for the distraction effect.
Break off quietly ….? Really? Divorce? What? Why?
Joseph the Carpenter seems to have been a decent man and a kindly one. He faced these troubling questions. But, of course, that is not the beginning...
Below is the core story, as we have it.
First of all, Mary's experience:In the sixth month [of Elizabeth's pregnancy] the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. And he came to her and said, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.”[a] But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?”[b] The angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born[c] will be holy; he will be called Son of God. And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. For nothing will be impossible with God.” Then Mary said, “Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word.” Then the angel departed from her. In those days Mary set out and went with haste to a Judean town in the hill country, where she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth
And Mary remained with her about three months and then returned to her home.(Luke 1:26-39, 56 NRSVUE).
Then there is Joseph, the carpenter, of Nazareth:
“This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit. Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly. But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus,[a] because he will save his people from their sins.”....
Joseph did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
(Matthew 1:18-21, 24,25 NIV).
HERE IT IS AGAIN, BUT LET'S TEASE IT OUT A LITTLE....
Looking (again) at the story from Mary’s viewpoint:
In the sixth month [of Elizabeth's pregnancy] the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth,
In the sixth month [of Elizabeth's pregnancy] the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth,
Were Mary and Joseph "locals" in Nazareth town? Did either of them have people there? (They both had connection to Judea.)
to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary.
The accounts make it clear that Joseph was not the birth father. Yet his ancestry proved to be important. Mary was a young woman who evidently had a "respectable" reputation. (Further on we learn that she was sexually inexperienced, but knowledgeable.)
And he came to her and said, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.”[a]
Where was Mary? Indoors? Outdoors? Alone? The greeting sounds positive enough. But how suddenly did Gabriel come to Mary? What did Gabriel look like to her? What kind of encounter was this?
But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be.
What? She was confused and disturbed (NLT). Note, it was the words and not the appearance that perplexed Mary. Surely that torpedoes the prevailing tradition of angelic winged beings in dresses?
We sympathise with Mary. Just what was this unknown person saying and why?
The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God.
Was Mary fearful at Gabriel's coming? Whatever his appearance, he must have been credible as bringing God's message. To be told that God was favouring her was special - God's favourite.
And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus.
Just shocking at that point. This unknown "male" talking about a conception in her! About a baby - hers! No doubt Mary did expect to have a baby at some future time.
He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High,
Her baby will be great and known as the Son of the Most High? Her baby! That just sounds weird. She was not even connected to the "powers-that-be"; she was an unknown, really.
and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.”
Her baby will occupy David's (long lost) throne? David his ancestor? (Matthew 1 and Luke 3 show an ancestral line through Joseph, the man to be the supposed father of Jesus.) An endless kingdom - what is that!
Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?”[b]
How?! Mary, whatever her age, knew enough about "the birds and the bees" to know that she needed the male component to conceive. The CSB translates v34: “How can this be, since I have not had sexual relations with a man?” (More literally: "since I do not know a man".) Definitely impossible - humanly speaking. That fact would have to be be in the forefront of Mary's thoughts in that weird encounter.
The angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born[c] will be holy; he will be called Son of God.
I wonder how well Mary understood the angelic explanation. The Holy Spirit figures largely in the New Testament, but what was her understanding of him? The parallel expression of the power of the Most High was an explanation. The CEV translates v35: “The Holy Spirit will come down to you, and God's power will come over you."
And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. For nothing will be impossible with God.”
Well, Elizabeth had a male in her life (and he also had a story to tell). The impossible made possible was that Elizabeth was considered to be unable to bear a child, but, said the angel, she was actually then well on the way.
Then Mary said, “Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word.” Then the angel departed from her.
Mary could not have grasped the whole significance of this conversation. Nonetheless, she calls herself the servant of the Lord. The servant word is used to cover the status of slave. Mary could say to God, your will be done - and mean it with her heart.
Mary surely had a lot to think about - but maybe very little time to do it?
In those days Mary set out and went with haste to a Judean town in the hill country, where she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth.
In those days Mary set out and went with haste to a Judean town in the hill country, where she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth.
In those days - was it an immediate and urgent decision? Mary was in haste - why? Did she need an understanding support in her unprecedented condition? What was her home like? Did Nazareth promise her only rebuke? It was not so with Elizabeth. What about telling Joseph? (He would eventually find out.)
And Mary remained with her about three months and then returned to her home.
That would have to be about the time Elizabeth gave birth to John. Would Mary have looked pregnant with her first child?
(Above, in bold, Luke 1:26-39, 56 NRSVUE)
Actually, of "Jesus Christ" or as per some manuscripts, of the Christ.
came about: His mother Mary was pledged
That is a legal and binding agreement - I wonder who was involved in reaching that agreement
to be married to Joseph,
How had the "engagement" come about; had the couple met before that? Where did they meet? Galilee or Judea?
but before they came together,
That is, before the estate of matrimony was entered, ie, sexual relations (see above)
she was found to be pregnant
Found! Who did the finding, and when, and where? How did they find? Did the grapevine bring a report from Judea to someone, and thus to Joseph? Or, was this after Mary returned and was "showing"?
came about: His mother Mary was pledged
That is a legal and binding agreement - I wonder who was involved in reaching that agreement
to be married to Joseph,
How had the "engagement" come about; had the couple met before that? Where did they meet? Galilee or Judea?
but before they came together,
That is, before the estate of matrimony was entered, ie, sexual relations (see above)
she was found to be pregnant
Found! Who did the finding, and when, and where? How did they find? Did the grapevine bring a report from Judea to someone, and thus to Joseph? Or, was this after Mary returned and was "showing"?
I assume the way this is reported it was not Joseph who “found”. He must, then, have been told. Why was he trying to solve his problem alone? At this remote time and in this very different culture it seems strange.
through the Holy Spirit
The Holy Spirit came into Mary's story early (see below). The point is stressed. This is an explanatory note Joseph did not have at the beginning.
Because Joseph her husband
They were not yet living as man and wife but Joseph has the status of husband. (These days some people live together first, and may later make the legal contract, or not.)
was faithful to the law,
Joseph's adherence to the Law meant he could not avoid divorcing Mary on the ground of adultery. The potential "penalty" for Mary was surely extreme...
and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly
"In mind". What do you think - was Joseph a man torn between kindness and duty? Were they a young couple in love (like in the "Song of Solomon")? Clearly Joseph gave the shocking matter thought. He did not just react in disgust, or anger, or from male wounded pride. He took his time and considered how he could lessen Mary's disgrace.
through the Holy Spirit
The Holy Spirit came into Mary's story early (see below). The point is stressed. This is an explanatory note Joseph did not have at the beginning.
Because Joseph her husband
They were not yet living as man and wife but Joseph has the status of husband. (These days some people live together first, and may later make the legal contract, or not.)
was faithful to the law,
Joseph's adherence to the Law meant he could not avoid divorcing Mary on the ground of adultery. The potential "penalty" for Mary was surely extreme...
and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly
"In mind". What do you think - was Joseph a man torn between kindness and duty? Were they a young couple in love (like in the "Song of Solomon")? Clearly Joseph gave the shocking matter thought. He did not just react in disgust, or anger, or from male wounded pride. He took his time and considered how he could lessen Mary's disgrace.
I do not follow Joseph's reasoning - the baby was coming! He was contemplating disowning the child and Mary. (Would not disgrace, or worse, follow if he went ahead with the divorce, despite his good intention?) How would mother and child fare, wherever they were? Or, is the answer that Mary was still in Judea and was Joseph thinking she could remain there? Or go back there in haste?
But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream
This dream was the first reported but there were more to come. Somehow Joseph recognised the message as coming from the Lord.
and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife,
Joseph's way is clear - their marriage is secure. (The NIV's explanatory "home" emphasises the completion of the marriage and entry to cohabitation.) That sounds like Mary was right there in Nazareth and they could complete the marriage process right away. Was that what they did?
because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son,
As with Mary, Joseph is informed that the Holy Spirit is responsible for the pregnancy. I wonder how much Joseph knew about him?
and you are to give him the name Jesus,[a]
The NIV note explains: Jesus is the Greek form of Joshua, which means the Lord saves.
because he will save his people from their sins.”
Jesus will become the one who rescues. Rescues his people. Does that sound like a nationalistic limitation? Not so - for though "his own" were the Jewish people, Jesus broadened the mission to reach the whole world, the world which God loved so much.
Save (rescue) from their sins - why is saving necessary? People (unme) need to be separated from their sins. From the consequence of rebellion and disobedience to God. Saving from sins is central. How can sins endanger a person? Sins are like a millstone hung round our neck as we drown.
Joseph did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus. Taking Mary home was a big step for Joseph on the basis of a dream! The unusual nature of their initial time together is made clear. Their union logically happens before the journey to Bethlehem, but how does that fit with Luke's odd description, I still wonder?
(above, in bold, Matthew 1:18-21,24,25 NIV).
Conclusion
That is Mary, the young woman who bore the Christ for humankind. Therefore, all motherhood and all women will be just about more sacred in the eyes of men and treasured; in no way less than males - right? Maybe.
Mary went away for about three months. Had she hastily "cleared out" to Judea ? If so, Joseph was left in ignorance of Mary's advancing pregnancy. It seems clear that Mary had not told Joseph of her fearful experience and her agreement. Why did they not talk it over?
However, Mary herself had no precedent nor reported guidance on how to proceed. I wonder if she had any living parents or close relatives in Nazareth, or elsewhere? What was her home - was she just working in a household there? Why did she go off to far away Judea to her relative? Was that where her relatives were?
When she returned was she “showing” to the alert eye? If not, probably soon would be. I think many a pregnancy can be guessed from the appearance of the mother-to-be.
"Divorce her quietly". Actually, I think Joseph was in a bind. If Mary, "divorced" from their pledged estate, remained in Nazareth and carried the child to term, how would she fare? I do not know how unmarried mothers were regarded then. It is only comparatively recently that in Western culture the fact could be accepted and much harsh treatment ended. (What happens in other cultures today? I fear it is grim, at least in places.)
"Divorce her quietly". Actually, I think Joseph was in a bind. If Mary, "divorced" from their pledged estate, remained in Nazareth and carried the child to term, how would she fare? I do not know how unmarried mothers were regarded then. It is only comparatively recently that in Western culture the fact could be accepted and much harsh treatment ended. (What happens in other cultures today? I fear it is grim, at least in places.)
Here, once upon a time, "breach of promise" was actually a crime. My own ancestry includes just such a case, sorry to say. Nowadays any spotlight seems to fall only on a mother-to-be, as though she alone were involved! (Recently I heard again of newborns sadly abandoned, including a boy left outside a Canberra fire station.)
Matthew's focus - chapter 2 - then shifted to Bethlehem events. As to the chronology of Jesus, I am left with somewhat of a puzzle. Matthew makes clear that the marriage custom was completed (location unstated), though without "marital relations" before Jesus was born. (Some people find difficult the idea of later "normal" married life for Mary and Joseph. Is that related to the all too frequent misuse of sex? Is not sex God's good gift for mutual use in the marriage relationship?)
But Luke (2) says that Joseph took Mary, to whom he was "engaged", to Bethlehem ("obviously pregnant", NLT). Where and when was their marriage celebrated and with whom? Had the months of gestation been mostly in Nazareth? Had the marriage been delayed?
A little diffidently I noted that Luke used the perfect tense (past action with continuing effect) and passive voice to say betrothed. Yes, when these events were starting the pair were "engaged". That engagement continued to its expected outcome. Was that before they left for Bethlehem? (Plans may have been dislocated by the edicts from the Roman authorities.) However, apart from Wycliffe's, English Bibles overwhelmingly say "engaged", or the like, as they journeyed.
As to contemporary wedding customs for the bride and bridegroom, we get some ideas from John chapters 2, and 3; Matthew chapters 9 and 25 (and parallels).
It is obvious that neither Mark's nor John's Gospel recount a miraculous conception of Jesus (although John opened with Jesus "in the beginning"). What did people in the early circles preserving Mark and John think about Jesus being conceived? Perhaps, they had a question they could not answer, and died, not knowing. No doubt it did not take long before the birth accounts became more widely known. That could happen in an oral tradition and where pericopes were independently treasured before the final document was compiled (Luke 1:1-4 tells us that.)
Did Paul the apostle know this story? Perhaps he did meet Mary? Although not mentioning the Holy Spirit, Paul gave the believers in Galatia this concise summary of the critical facts:
This is how it was with us. We were like children ruled by the powers of this world. But when the time was right, God sent his Son, and a woman gave birth to him. His Son obeyed the Law, so he could set us free from the Law, and we could become God's children (Galatians 4:3-5 CEV).
This is how it was with us. We were like children ruled by the powers of this world. But when the time was right, God sent his Son, and a woman gave birth to him. His Son obeyed the Law, so he could set us free from the Law, and we could become God's children (Galatians 4:3-5 CEV).
A slavery.A time.A Son sent.A woman.A Son born.The Law.A freedom.A becoming.
John stated the purpose of his selection: but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name (John 20:31 ESV). Do you think that is very, very clear? A reader can check it out by reading the document, asking God the while.
May you be blessed by God
Allen Hampton
Photo by Jametlene Reskp on Unsplash
Photo by Stephanie Hau on Unsplash
Scripture quotations marked (CEV) are from the Contemporary English Version Copyright © 1991, 1992, 1995 by American Bible Society. Used by Permission.
Scripture quotations marked (CSB) are from the Christian Standard Bible. Copyright © 2017 by Holman Bible Publishers. Used by permission. Christian Standard Bible®, and CSB® are federally registered trademarks of Holman Bible Publishers, all rights reserved.
Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Scripture quotations marked (NASB20) are taken from New American Standard Bible. Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation, La Habra, Calif. All rights reserved. Used by permission. www.lockman.org
Scripture quotations marked (NIV) are taken from the Holy Bible, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.
Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, copyright ©1996, 2004, 2007, 2013 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.
Scripture quotations marked (NRSVUE) are from the New Revised Standard Version, Updated Edition. Copyright © 2021 National Council of Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission.
Bible passages by copy and paste from Bible Gateway
Edn 2, 6/12/25


No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are not moderated. Allen Hampton